Skip to main content

Plaintiff Not Permitted to Add Family Law Claim After Expiry of Limitation Period

The case of Malik v. Nikbakht indicates that, if an injured plaintiff wants to advance a claim under the Family Law Act, it must be done within the limitation period.

Justice Cavanagh overturned a decision of a master.  The master had applied authority of a single judge of the Divisional Court, Justice Moore.

Justice Moore had concluded that a Family Law Act claim is only a head of damages, not a new cause of action. Therefore, the plaintiff was permitted to amend the claim to add a Family Law Act claim after the expiry of the limitation period.

Justice Cavanagh disagreed with Justice Moore, stating that a Family Law Act claim is a new cause of action and must be brought within the limitation period. He held that the plaintiff’s Family Law Act claim was statute-barred.

Further, Justice Cavanagh indicated that a Superior Court judge has “coordinate jurisdiction” with a single judge of the Divisional Court.

He noted that “…decisions of a court of coordinate jurisdiction, while not absolutely binding, should be followed in the absence of cogent reasons to depart from them…[T]he judgment should not be followed…where the subsequent judge is satisfied that the first decision was plainly wrong.”