<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Waivers &#8211; Rogers Partners LLP</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rogerspartners.com/tag/waivers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rogerspartners.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:58:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.21</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Field of “Beams”: Court Denies Claim of Plaintiff Blinded By the Light During Rec-League Softball Game</title>
		<link>https://www.rogerspartners.com/field-of-beams-court-denies-claim-of-plaintiff-blinded-by-the-light-during-rec-league-softball-game/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=field-of-beams-court-denies-claim-of-plaintiff-blinded-by-the-light-during-rec-league-softball-game</link>
					<comments>https://www.rogerspartners.com/field-of-beams-court-denies-claim-of-plaintiff-blinded-by-the-light-during-rec-league-softball-game/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpllpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 15:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupiers' Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waivers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rogerspartners.com/?p=7791</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael Kryworuk In May 2026, Justice Mark L. Edwards released his decision in Kolsen v. The Corporation of the Town of New Tecumseth et al, 2026 ONSC 2729. This decision concerned the trial of a matter whereby the plaintiff was struck in the eye by a baseball while playing in an adult recreational league. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com/field-of-beams-court-denies-claim-of-plaintiff-blinded-by-the-light-during-rec-league-softball-game/">Field of “Beams”: Court Denies Claim of Plaintiff Blinded By the Light During Rec-League Softball Game</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com">Rogers Partners LLP</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rogerspartners.com/field-of-beams-court-denies-claim-of-plaintiff-blinded-by-the-light-during-rec-league-softball-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sign and Beware: The Enforceability of Liability Waivers in Limiting Legal Responsibility</title>
		<link>https://www.rogerspartners.com/sign-and-beware-the-enforceability-of-liability-waivers-in-limiting-legal-responsibility/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sign-and-beware-the-enforceability-of-liability-waivers-in-limiting-legal-responsibility</link>
					<comments>https://www.rogerspartners.com/sign-and-beware-the-enforceability-of-liability-waivers-in-limiting-legal-responsibility/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpllpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 22:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waivers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rogerspartners.com/?p=7277</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>By Elizabeth Branopolski In Bernier v. Ottawa, 2024 ONSC 6725, the plaintiffs brought an action for injuries sustained while participating in a cycling event. The Defendants, Ville d’Ottawa, GrandFondo Ottawa, and Greg Capello, sought to rely on the terms of a waiver signed by the plaintiff to dismiss the action. &#160; Background The plaintiff, Sandra&#160;Bernier, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com/sign-and-beware-the-enforceability-of-liability-waivers-in-limiting-legal-responsibility/">Sign and Beware: The Enforceability of Liability Waivers in Limiting Legal Responsibility</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com">Rogers Partners LLP</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rogerspartners.com/sign-and-beware-the-enforceability-of-liability-waivers-in-limiting-legal-responsibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fridays with Rogers Partners</title>
		<link>https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-67/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fridays-with-rogers-partners-67</link>
					<comments>https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-67/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpllpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2021 21:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Friday Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupiers' Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waivers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rogerspartners.com/?p=5514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>At our weekly meeting, Pip Swartz led a further discussion on the decision in Arksey v. Sky Zone Toronto[1]. A summary of the case from our previous discussion of it can be found here: https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-47/ During our firm’s discussion of Arksey, a hypothetical question was raised: how would the judge have ruled in Arksey if [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-67/">Fridays with Rogers Partners</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com">Rogers Partners LLP</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-67/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fridays with Rogers Partners</title>
		<link>https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-47/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fridays-with-rogers-partners-47</link>
					<comments>https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-47/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpllpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Friday Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rogerspartners.com/?p=5126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>At our weekly meeting, Athina Ionita discussed the recent decision in Arksey v Sky Zone Toronto, 2021 ONSC 4594. In that case, the defendant moved for a summary judgment motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim for damages for personal injury. The plaintiff was injured when attending at the defendant’s premises, Sky Zone, a trampoline recreation [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-47/">Fridays with Rogers Partners</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com">Rogers Partners LLP</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-47/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>From the Desk of Jocelyn Brogan</title>
		<link>https://www.rogerspartners.com/desk-jocelyn-brogan/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=desk-jocelyn-brogan</link>
					<comments>https://www.rogerspartners.com/desk-jocelyn-brogan/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpllpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 12:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[From the Desk of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupiers' Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recreational Facilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waivers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogerspartners.com/?p=1768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Outside of work life, I often find myself noticing conditions or activities carried out on properties that have the potential of being the subject matter of a personal injury action. However, just because I notice the vulnerabilities of occupiers in everyday life, this certainly does not mean that a potential lawsuit equates to a claim [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com/desk-jocelyn-brogan/">From the Desk of Jocelyn Brogan</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com">Rogers Partners LLP</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rogerspartners.com/desk-jocelyn-brogan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
