<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Waivers &#8211; Rogers Partners LLP</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rogerspartners.com/tag/waivers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rogerspartners.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 03:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.19</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Sign and Beware: The Enforceability of Liability Waivers in Limiting Legal Responsibility</title>
		<link>https://www.rogerspartners.com/sign-and-beware-the-enforceability-of-liability-waivers-in-limiting-legal-responsibility/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sign-and-beware-the-enforceability-of-liability-waivers-in-limiting-legal-responsibility</link>
					<comments>https://www.rogerspartners.com/sign-and-beware-the-enforceability-of-liability-waivers-in-limiting-legal-responsibility/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpllpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 22:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waivers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rogerspartners.com/?p=7277</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>By Elizabeth Branopolski In Bernier v. Ottawa, 2024 ONSC 6725, the plaintiffs brought an action for injuries sustained while participating in a cycling event. The Defendants, Ville d’Ottawa, GrandFondo Ottawa, and Greg Capello, sought to rely on the terms of a waiver signed by the plaintiff to dismiss the action. &#160; Background The plaintiff, Sandra&#160;Bernier, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com/sign-and-beware-the-enforceability-of-liability-waivers-in-limiting-legal-responsibility/">Sign and Beware: The Enforceability of Liability Waivers in Limiting Legal Responsibility</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com">Rogers Partners LLP</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rogerspartners.com/sign-and-beware-the-enforceability-of-liability-waivers-in-limiting-legal-responsibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fridays with Rogers Partners</title>
		<link>https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-67/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fridays-with-rogers-partners-67</link>
					<comments>https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-67/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpllpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2021 21:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Friday Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupiers' Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waivers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rogerspartners.com/?p=5514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>At our weekly meeting, Pip Swartz led a further discussion on the decision in Arksey v. Sky Zone Toronto[1]. A summary of the case from our previous discussion of it can be found here: https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-47/ During our firm’s discussion of Arksey, a hypothetical question was raised: how would the judge have ruled in Arksey if [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-67/">Fridays with Rogers Partners</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com">Rogers Partners LLP</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-67/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fridays with Rogers Partners</title>
		<link>https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-47/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fridays-with-rogers-partners-47</link>
					<comments>https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-47/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpllpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 16:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Friday Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.rogerspartners.com/?p=5126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>At our weekly meeting, Athina Ionita discussed the recent decision in Arksey v Sky Zone Toronto, 2021 ONSC 4594. In that case, the defendant moved for a summary judgment motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim for damages for personal injury. The plaintiff was injured when attending at the defendant’s premises, Sky Zone, a trampoline recreation [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-47/">Fridays with Rogers Partners</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com">Rogers Partners LLP</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rogerspartners.com/fridays-with-rogers-partners-47/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>From the Desk of Jocelyn Brogan</title>
		<link>https://www.rogerspartners.com/desk-jocelyn-brogan/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=desk-jocelyn-brogan</link>
					<comments>https://www.rogerspartners.com/desk-jocelyn-brogan/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpllpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 12:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[From the Desk of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupiers' Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recreational Facilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waivers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogerspartners.com/?p=1768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Outside of work life, I often find myself noticing conditions or activities carried out on properties that have the potential of being the subject matter of a personal injury action. However, just because I notice the vulnerabilities of occupiers in everyday life, this certainly does not mean that a potential lawsuit equates to a claim [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com/desk-jocelyn-brogan/">From the Desk of Jocelyn Brogan</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com">Rogers Partners LLP</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rogerspartners.com/desk-jocelyn-brogan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
