<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Advocacy &#8211; Rogers Partners LLP</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rogerspartners.com/tag/advocacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rogerspartners.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 19:11:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.19</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Closing Addresses in Jury Trials</title>
		<link>https://www.rogerspartners.com/closing-addresses-jury-trials/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=closing-addresses-jury-trials</link>
					<comments>https://www.rogerspartners.com/closing-addresses-jury-trials/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpllpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trials]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogerspartners.com/?p=1954</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In a closing address in a jury trial, a lawyer is afforded considerable latitude to advance the cause of his or her client fearlessly and with vigour. However, there are important limits. A jury must not be distracted from its task of deciding the case on the evidence, and trial fairness cannot be undermined. The [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com/closing-addresses-jury-trials/">Closing Addresses in Jury Trials</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com">Rogers Partners LLP</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rogerspartners.com/closing-addresses-jury-trials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resolute Advocacy vs. Civil Fraud</title>
		<link>https://www.rogerspartners.com/resolute-advocacy-vs-civil-fraud/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=resolute-advocacy-vs-civil-fraud</link>
					<comments>https://www.rogerspartners.com/resolute-advocacy-vs-civil-fraud/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpllpadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogerspartners.com/?p=1851</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal today in a case involving an allegation of civil fraud against a plaintiffs’ personal injury lawyer. The case of Paulus v. Fleury arose out of a car accident. At a pre-trial conference, the plaintiffs’ lawyer made submissions that he had &#8220;independent&#8221; witnesses to the accident who [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com/resolute-advocacy-vs-civil-fraud/">Resolute Advocacy vs. Civil Fraud</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rogerspartners.com">Rogers Partners LLP</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rogerspartners.com/resolute-advocacy-vs-civil-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
